A Structural Dilemma PDF Print E-mail
Written by Ed Rast   
Friday, 05 March 2010 07:31 AM

Did you know that FY 2010-2011 will be the ninth consecutive year of budget deficits for the City of San Jose, or that the City faces its largest deficit since the 2002-03 dot.com bust?

The most recent deficit estimate is $116.2 million, up from an estimate of $100+ million in the Mayor’s State of the City message last week.  Unfortunately, this will probably reach much higher and begin to approach $150M if the economy remains slow, unemployment stays high, and the state legislature once again raids city tax revenue to balance their budget.

Unlike the Federal Government, California cities are required by law to balance their budgets.  Revenue varies with business and consumer activity, rising as business activity increases, the economy expands, and unemployment is reduced.

Unfortunately, in recent years, San Jose has experienced declines in many major sources of revenue (click here for larger image):


In times of deficits, budgets are balanced by reducing non-legally required or contractual costs, borrowing from other city funds, reducing fund reserves, issuing city bonds, increasing taxable business or consumer activity, increasing tax rates, imposing new taxes, fees and service charges, or — usually the last choice — reducing staff.

In times of surplus, one would expect the city to put money aside to pay down deficits during tough times.  However, in San Jose — and many other jurisdictions — city leaders have responded to surpluses by spending more in long-term programs that may outlast the surplus, thus setting us up for what we currently face: structural budget deficits.  Our city consistently lacks the revenue in bad times to pay for programs created during good times which the city is obligated to fund.

The only way out of structural deficits is to reduce spending and increase revenue, but that's easier said than done.

In future blogs, we'll look closer at projected revenue and spending forecasts for FY 2010-2011.  In the meantime, you should read the 2010-2011 Preliminary General Fund Forecast presented to Council last November to get a better idea of where we stand.

Ed Rast is a neighborhood leader who does in-depth research and statistical analysis.  Opinions expressed are his alone and should not necessarily reflect upon groups of which he is member.

Comments (8)
You must register or log in to post comments. Your e-mail address will be kept private, and will not be shown to other commenters and visitors.

Register

Log in

  • Anonymous

    Festival

    I wonder if the city will continue it's support of all the political correct festivals. Hey $100,000 may not seem like much, but it might support some clean parks to visit. How many non profits is the city supporting through use of city space and funding? Bring the city back to the basics. Spend a little less of studies and turn off the free money!
  • Anonymous

    Fed up

    I’m so tired of the blame being put onto the backs of the employees. This is about mismanagement, mismanagement and more mismanagement. This is exactly why we have a union. That is why we are a union.


    On a side note. Less money, more crooks, more crime and more guns. MORE reasons to reminded yourself to be extra safe.

    Hey Ed. What are response times looking like for fire and police these days?
  • Kathleen

    Great Job Ed

    Like Fed Up above says,"Less money, more crooks, more crime and more guns. MORE reasons to reminded yourself to be extra safe." I guess our Victim Offender case load will keep increasing daily.
  • Anonymous
    What does the city do each year with the money it saves from a police department that is short at least 400-500 officers? That is $50 million that the city saves on our backs, while we go out to districts on midnights that never have all the beats filled. We already agreed to a 5% pay reduction LAST year to pre-fund our medical insurance for retirement, and now they want to take an extra 10% cut? We are already paying 13% of our gross income into our own retirement fund yet we are continually getting the message of how greedy we are and it is our fault for the financial mess. What about the $500 million the city spent on a ridiculous city hall, or golf courses, or low income housing that brings in no revenue for the city? Why do we have city council members making $100k per year, plus an $8,000 a year car allowance, plus great benefits, with very bloated staffs? Other local cities have councils which are paid only a stipend for their service, yet their cities are in great shape (see Santa Clara and Sunnyvale). Why do we have a police auditor making $175k a year plus benefits, plus a full staff in a cozy office, when there are only a relative handful of complaints they look into, and they actually have to go out begging people to complain so they can justify their jobs?

    When I see all of this corrected, plus we are fully staffed, then I will consider ANOTHER pay cut. Until then, I say we don't give back a dime, because every time we give something back we will never get it back, and it will be a matter of time before we are looking at taking yet another pay-cut. It is a slippery slope to give back hard earned pay. We need to fight it and I also say we consider combining with fire as it was before to combine our resources.

    I feel terrible for all that are out of work. My own wife was laid off. That being said, I remember why we get paid, and earn our money, when I was wrestling recently with a violent, out of control parolee-at-large.
  • Anonymous

    well said

    I have to aggree with your comments, we are continually taking it in the shorts. We have not increased our officer ranks in several years. I beleive we are at 1992 or 1997 levels? Yet the city is growing in population andwe are annexing several of the unicorporated areas. When will enough be enough?

    I listened to the Mayors state of the union address and he slipped in several shots at the unions. I have also seen him on sevral local news outlets asking for employees to take a pay cut. I am not an econimics or finance major but I don't understand how he can request that when he haven't increased our net size of sworn officers and support staff.
  • Anonymous

    Pay Back

    Understand the 1% per year payback (over 5 years) was for the un funded medical. It's important to know that money is in contol of the association. If it was in control of the city we wouldn't have signed a contract. I really don't mind the 1% per year to solidify the retirement of the Police. What I do have a problem of is the city wanting to get into our retirment and maybe using the 1% pay back as a stepping stone.
    I also have to point out the pay outs the city does when a officer retires. Has anyone noticed the payouts by hours are usually highest with those that wear gold? I understand the pay scale, I just cannot understand the O/T when the real work is being done by the troops.
  • Upset Taxpayer

    Where Millions of your Taxes are wasted

    " What does the city do each year with the money it saves from a police department that is short at least 400-500 officers? "

    Today's Merc's shows "tip of city staff's $50 - $100 million wasted taxes per year pyramid" going to insiders, campaign contributors, special interests and developers

    The Rep's last act?
    http://www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_14524206

    - City paid $20 of $24 million to build Rep on city land and gave Rep 15 year $0 lease

    - City gives Rep $300,000 for building operating and maintenance & $106,000 arts grant = $406,000 per year which was more $ in prior years

    Rep for 9 years got free rent and $400- 600,000 in grants but Rep so badly mismanaged they asked city for $1 million bailout in 2006

    City staff recommended giving Rep $2 million credit line / 4 years = $500,000 + $406,000 =
    $906,000 year

    American Musical Theater in 2006 got $1 million city loan plus $ millions in grants then went bankrupt in 2008

    City staff recommended budgets have for years wasted millions taxes while cutting public safety, so we don't have enough police and fire officers





  • Anonymous

    How about a NPR radio talk show


    Ed, you should contact Doug Berman the creator of the NPR radio talk show. Talk show is a NPR powerhouse. Maybe you could talk him into a NPR radio talk show. The tappet brothers Tom and Ray have over two million listeners every Sunday morning.
    Your show could become a inspiration to many with budget problems, bur seriously, you would need to add a short comedy segment in the beginning as the Magliozzi brothers have. Budgets problems can be difficult, but comedy would make the show more interesting.
    Give it a thought, I think you would be great.
  • Anonymous
    How about the city stop building endless Section 8 housing on empty plots of land and attract an actual business or manufacturing hub of some sort. Enough is enough. I won't give back a dime of my wages until they stop giving money to every special interest group that suits their re-election needs.
You must be registered to write a comment. Click here to register or click here to log in.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

Last Updated on Friday, 05 March 2010 07:37 AM
 

Ask Beat Cop

Submit a question for Beat Cop to answer in a future blog post. Complete the form and click submit!





Type your question for Beat Cop


Ask Ed

Ed Rast is a neighborhood leader who spends his free time analyzing budgets and spreadsheets.

Now’s your chance to pick his brain. You may see a response to your question in Ed's next blog.

Please note that Ed’s blogs present his personal opinions and not those of any organization of which he is a member.






Type your question for Ed


Links